|
PRESERVING WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE SITES
The Threat of Man-made and Natural Disasters and Humanity's Moral Obligation to Provide Needed Protections
George Pararas-Carayannis
INTRODUCTION
A number of World Cultural and Natural Heritage
Sites have been ravaged by a variety of natural and man-made disasters.
The Indian Ocean tsunami
was the most recent example of a disaster that caused, not
only an appalling loss of human life and wholesale destruction of communities,
but damage of several sites inscribed on the World Heritage
List,
including the Old Town of Galle and its Fortifications in Sri Lanka and
at the Mahabalipuram and the Sun Temple of Koranak, in India.
The World Heritage Convention
As early as 1972, UNESCO, realizing the urgent
need to protect world heritage sites from conflicts of interest, neglect,
wars and natural
hazards, took the initiative of holding the First World Heritage
Convention (WHC). Its purpose was to initiate an international program
that would secure the commitments of participating nations to a protective
mission
for the recognition of the importance and universal value
of World Heritage sites.
The Convention set meticulous guidelines for a program of cataloguing, naming, and conserving sites of outstanding cultural or natural importance to the common heritage of humanity. Subsequently, to ensure the success of the program, an enormous amount of effective action was undertaken by participating member nations, the World Heritage Committee, its Bureau and its Secretariat, as well as by the associated consultative bodies.
World
Heritage Sites at Risk
As the list of heritage sites kept growing, the World Heritage Committee
realized that a more effective action plan was required. The member
nations themselves needed to take a more active role that would involve
continuous and systematic monitoring of how well these cultural and
natural sites were being preserved and protected. The implementation
of such expanded action plans required an increase in the level of
financial and technical resources. In spite of past concerted efforts,
many world heritage sites remained endangered, not only by natural
disasters but by inadequate management, under funding, pollution and,
tragically, by numerous armed conflicts. For
example, there was massive destruction of World Heritage monuments
by the war in Dubrovnik. In
Afghanistan, the Taliban destroyed 4th and 5th century Buddhist
monuments in Bamiyan Valley.
Destruction of 4th and 5th century Buddhist monuments in Bamiyan Valley by the Taliban
The
war in Iraq destroyed priceless Omeyan and Abaside monuments of
the Assyrian
and Babylonian era. There was an appalling plundering of works
of art from
Iraqi museums - which Jacques Chirac rightfully characterized
as “crimes
against humanity”. About 9 000 to 10 000 works of art were stolen
from the Baghdad Museum. The plundering of the Iraqi works of art was
well planned in advance. Although the Coalition forces took
precautions not to bomb historic sites, they did destroy a large
number of them later, a proof of ignorant
vandalism and savage revenge. There was no respect for the great civilization
that existed in that part of the world and its historic and cultural
significance for mankind.
A large number of Omeyan and Abaside cultural monuments were destroyed by U.S. and Coalition Forces during urban clashes during the war in Iraq.
Even
without civil strife or wars, several other world heritage sites
were severely threatened by other global threats, such as environmental
degradation and increasing population pressure. For xample,
environmental
air pollution and human encroachment were possible elements
detrimental to the preservation of Taj Mahal and of the three World
Heritage monuments
in Agra. Protecting such great works of human heritage and
culture were real, urgent and required immediate action.
The
Agra Fort in India, another World Heritage site threatened by neglect
and urban encroachment.
Realizing these problems UNESCO expanded the mandate of the Convention and developed a “List of World Heritage in Danger”. This list was to be instrumental in protecting sites identified as threatened by serious dangers. Under certain conditions, listed sites could obtain funds from the World Heritage Fund. Thus, thanks to this foresight and joint labor, many sites and properties were protected, restored and, indeed in many cases, saved from total destruction. However, in the following years, the number of sites on this list kept on growing and unfortunately there were no sufficient funds to go around. To raise revenue that could provide more resources for preservation, WHC encouraged tourism. However, it was also realized that, in some instances, the corresponding increase in tourist traffic could also have severely damaging effects.
Another problem that hindered preservation of endangered sites was
population explosion and encroachment. One of the fundamental issues
that arose in many of the countries where such great works of cultural
heritage sites exist was the tension between economic development and
historic preservation. Industrial development and associated pollution
posed a great threat to both urban monuments and natural parks alike. Several
Heritage sites were also threatened by extensive warfare. Thus, for
several countries that did not have adequately means, protecting and
maintaining their inscribed cultural sites became a great logistical
political and economic problem.
Humanity's Moral Obligation to Protect World Heritage Sites
The
need to protect World Heritage sites cannot be overemphasized. In a
world in constant change, calls for the conservation and protection
of threatened Heritage sites should never be silenced. Admittedly,
it may be difficult sometimes to defend an undertaking to
protect human
culture. Such action may be viewed as yielding relatively
few tangible or immediate "returns" on investments - particularly
in countries with emerging economies. However, the real challenge
is that of promoting
a global awareness in the importance of preserving a cultural
inheritance whose loss would be irreparable, for precisely
the reason that its
value cannot be easily quantified or defended. The roots
of the past and of the human ingenuity are embedded in works
of nature or culture
that represent an incalculable spiritual resource for humanity,
that should never be neglected as irrelevant or viewed as
not sufficiently
important. Clearly, there must be a global recognition of
common human heritage that merits special attention and
protection.
The Shore Temple at Mahablipuram in India was partially inundated by the tsunami of 2004 but fortunately there was no serious damage.
The task of safeguarding the world's cultural and natural heritage
treasures is an inherently challenging one. In
a world that seems increasingly torn by divisiveness
and conflicts of political ideologies
and religions, the importance of the non-tangible values
of the human aspiration for beauty and meaning - as exemplified
by works of art
and culture - needs to be constantly affirmed, since
this may be one of the common denominators that unite
us as human beings on this very finite planet. The fundamental
strength of culture and beauty - regardless of its diversity
-
is a universal dimension of outstanding value to humanity
that must be shared and
preserved for present and future generations. Cultural
identity is the common heritage for all mankind and needs
to be recognized, respected,
cherished, promoted and protected.
SEE OTHER PAPERS RELATED TO DISASTER ARCHAEOLOGY
WOMEN IN THE MARINE MYTHOLOGY OF ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN THEIR ROLES & SYMBOLISMS..by Dr. G. Pararas-Carayannis & Dr. A Laoupi - XXXII PACEM IN MARIBUS Conference5-8 November 2007, Malta (PDF).
THE CAVE OF CASTANIA - A Speleological Wonder
The socio-cultural profile of hazards. Disaster Archaeology and the risk assessmen tof past catastrophic events .by Dr. Amanda Laoupi ...............
THE DIVINE FIRES OF CREATION. HOMERIC HEPHAESTOS AS A COMET / METEOR GOD- by Dr. Amanda Laoupi ...........
The Protection of Cultural Heritage Sites from Natural and Man-Made Disasters
Excerpts from paper presented by George Pararas-Carayannis at GeoBen2000 Congress on the Geological and Geotechnical Influences in the .Preservation of Historical and Cultural Heritage - Moncalieri Castle, Stupinigi Castle - Torino, Italy 7-8-9 June 2000
THE GREEK MYTH OF PLEIADES IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NATURAL DISASTERS. - DECODING, DATING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATION by Dr. Amanda Laoupi
.....................
................................ Atlantis - The Lost Land Hypothesis and the Cataclysmic Mass Edifice Failure of the Volcano of Santorin in the Bronze Age
.................... The 1490 (1623) BC Tsunami Generated from the Eruption of the Volcano of Santorin in the Aegean Sea
The 15th Century B.C. Explosion and Collapse of the Volcano of Santorin in the Aegean Sea
Alexander the Great - Impact of the 325 BC Tsunami in the North Arabian Sea Upon his Fleet
........................
Tsunami ... Earthquakes .. Seismotectonics .. Hurricanes ... Volcanic Eruptions..Tornadoes..Natural Disasters. Disaster Archaeology. Climate Change . Ocean Governance
Announcements .. Completed Events .. Special Bulletins: Recent Disasters .. Books & Book Reviews .. Tsunami Society
Dr. George Pararas-Carayannis:. Bio Summary .. Publications .. Recent Publications .. Recent Books .. Miscellaneous Writings .. Consulting Services
Web Design by Dr. Carolyn Carayannis © Copyright 2008 / all rights reserved. © Copyright 1963-2007 George Pararas-Carayannis / all rights reserved / Information on this site is for viewing and personal information only - protected by copyright. Any unauthorized use or reproduction of material from this site without written permission is prohibited. Material included at the website links above is for informative and educational purposes and for disaster preparedness only. Any predictions of large earthquakes, destructive tsunamis, or any other natural disasters presented in these pages are based primarily on statistical determinations of the historical recurrence frequencies of such events. Such historical/statistical approaches are used only for long-term predictions. There is no intent by the author to predict or forecast any type of natural disaster or to frighten people.